Comparison methodology

One buyer scenario, one evidence standard, one complete cost boundary

Method in one sentence

Define representative work and mandatory constraints, require comparable evidence, normalize complete cost, and record uncertainty rather than hiding it in a score.

1. Frame the decision

Name the business outcome, users and roles, data, volume, exceptions, integrations, controls, location, deadline, term, budget boundary, and final approver. A comparison without this scenario is a general product description, not a purchase recommendation.

2. Build mandatory gates

Identify requirements whose failure prevents purchase: a critical workflow, security control, legal term, data location, accessibility requirement, export, integration, availability level, or implementation deadline. Gates are decided before weighted preferences and cannot be averaged away.

3. Use an evidence ladder

PR97 distinguishes a vendor web statement, written support answer, scripted demonstration, buyer-controlled trial, configuration capture, export sample, security report, quote, and contract commitment. Stronger evidence is required as business consequence rises.

4. Normalize commercial inputs

Use the same user population, account types, period, currency, tax treatment, commitment, growth, support, implementation scope, and renewal assumptions. Separate licenses, consumption, services, migration, internal labor, dependent tools, and exit. Unknown is a range with an owner, not zero.

5. Score observed fit

Evaluators score the same scripted scenarios independently before consensus. The record cites what happened, which plan and configuration were used, who observed it, what support was required, and which evidence remains open. Roadmap statements are not scored as delivered capability.

6. Review implementation and operation

Compare configuration, identity, permissions, migration, validation, integrations, testing, change management, training, acceptance, support transition, administration, and recovery. A product can fit a demo and still fail the buyer's implementation capacity.

7. Review contract, renewal, and exit

Verify term, notice, renewal, quantity reduction, uplift, service levels, support, security commitments, data rights, suspension, termination, export, transition, deletion, retention, and remedies. Test a representative export where feasible before commitment.

8. State confidence and limitation

PR97 public comparisons identify their source date and do not imply access to a buyer's tenant or contract. A conclusion is conditional on the stated scenario. The buyer must recheck facts that change by region, plan, quote, or date.